Accéder au contenu.

discussion - Re: [NURPA] Cour constitutionnelle demande clarifications à la CJEU - rétention des données

Objet : Groupe de discussion de la NURPA

Archives de la liste


Re: [NURPA] Cour constitutionnelle demande clarifications à la CJEU - rétention des données


Chronologique Discussions 
  • From: kirsten <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [NURPA] Cour constitutionnelle demande clarifications à la CJEU - rétention des données
  • Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:08:41 +0200
  • Autocrypt: ; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFkq2JEBEACp54EXJDCktRmh9Wpww+q03psgWTaRjs/bFDz2IMELcQf8nHe5SztE/+2j ZBp0kT63v7gDISQFE5+ab6Ow72x16qmxfBU+CZ8MDrmBqq5DgWZ0tNngQFhZ42w2CTetdUDg tf+m7YxFGA1pV1MmhQbvZ/Gz+ZOgt0mN26V2YChnSlwyqLBByk0FOVlx8St8L2nUYWf+rnyT 2SoME7EGtCzZPJ4nICEGKnGlm4GGH97Eh0lOCzvg2qZvGr0jc/aU9VzDIycFMVbDQ5pvlrQ3 bNajhI7cFdhd+S7nQc9qlaCStFZ7o+gpUfF89NvlqCLwoMOS6Y5C+pAs4LazjAg7WaNK03D0 CNETc9RBmtDg7lFX45qfYEgVoq5HZASmC8NTUc2POcPoW+7xzQsKtKzPG+RhMeqR6zD2CIzK I5DUSQ1QdtkK90p9tBeBEjAtuCwNS64ueVmUfd+/ZzoCeqR0XFDxvdVV/7iPib3kHh77KqEH bc+AdoFkpTktKcpHcUBs8rlt8l70E+KPbQTetNO92fUvjI2tn7KxPqfBKZdAMHJtADIkrWAo zpSUDYpkjVz/Ye/j4TA4O2r/0kEJBJSIvYkm5X/2imRY3RwAcsZ1BUkMBmVZ6fhPBk6FSa+o jDWvVqtmSb7QvEInPFLLdbkXg2YaizDM1i6mzGpljI3qyCOghQARAQABzRtraXJzdDNuIDxr aXJzdDNAcmlzZXVwLm5ldD7CwX0EEwEIACcFAlmmhJgCGwMFCQPCZwAFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsC BBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ5UKHxSMIoSmAjw/+NlCvHcpmfO8qOF0B53jXPogBb19o9ZtRfAAS U0uCs9uKCcZSs25KZBzcadupNEO982/FMd4vutYnbinBuYkBDIej9e1RjFqCPU3rFMFUoR4u X+V9QS9SZ+GhZr31WS7MK15HPwyRk6P+UpciQ6cFLHhulfAI1Y6OfSqSGGypdMhv0H0spf/V sX/rqoKasX7DT4ilYSn7HGOzO10jfxJusHOHHTP9/2YyBf/1HIhA2XXb4pJ2+NohtgtluCsz h7ZYlKbH2Nl+fCrgj+VmL9W3kXysTPr5ktnZswuOAMZkE8AChgH1oYzVVQO4Gf8tZKEO2Qrt lQodfGFkRk1bixnHx+p6ybYsnCzZ2FDGOyL1LZQ7zQM7MbMW7lNpgUiiGbXJVIENU0Qy6FaS v8/VkMcBnrl5rMNJ3INBl/Zok8tFlAgorqnccAOnhp6yOOzmzTNw1YlSNF8rpcMSWlcfYoSC +HaY6trUTXiBeoEHoyMcZtgwvmYKsfPi1TRrJ/OKllYmC4agwSNUPd2SDQzsE+SZtm0vq+Ox tAzrpU5yAi8UdeLJDelpXfI7aTuUBTFajXjDMMAr+R4bOLHZsWywM73WJPDWI1zRk4QyOkw9 jsWfXJYcW1K2URKRhBG4g1N71qhMWvYc8DEEEHoTIUfM/EkFOIiWXgTZtsPq8ZNiAdznq7LO wU0EWSrYkQEQALxPLO+lvjN9g0kHAeUI4rfo6XgWBtT/k2mNv0Ag80jHELNhjEU7e6FHoSb5 buvlX8/+09zqjBUw8k3pIqpXyyYvQzJWfyD3UbiqRwbF4ojHLz5mkOAx2oH7mbTDKYKuFOJ3 fW205Do581XPUcRteMjBlr2jzR4uszB1J5b7Ha7O8kfCxwnR2qdaO4dnNF40TwCK9XU7ghFB D+KeYLWWxpwcI4gq9KHCi4A/RO7H8YWSOAydrUHMfBW4TVLYD6Dk6Y3TiXIDce2IfOQNvyqg hK+lDpDrMs9HhvABqPAo58SRfKuFfEoWAR9IIPVhdPq6Op+DWXl9DFjBO+m2KXXHpuGIOSn+ 2ST8/Nj+gjMbHQ0mJLQv0e/mloBh0ABO05fBuptbH/SALMjfHfgOlSVX05wWMHExU6mKkfgn n3KR201rXW+9KTl0WXCwIAMS3llgoOVHmRg8qvAlbeQ5Yy13NWD/7nMI6HHOQsD5IBghGyY8 9F+kx7h3GNcj6ygrymxMYds3e5F9GVhty9KsnqgA23g33njvjFrJHzNeOcL4rcxsQL7pH62r olBKwPMrL11XjCVrSMXXM8TIIZ2N9ddQWJEoScX10WmBufI83B415Xi01kt5xaOYmGK9gpqx NaxybDpKvmCtddw4SgBs1iQRxsEAJipeWKgNNYLUu7XK/DbNABEBAAHCwWUEGAEKAA8FAlkq 2JECGwwFCQPCZwAACgkQ5UKHxSMIoSkGuQ/8DZsW2Eow2RWPVedxuGRldCN6haVF7hctJRVL OUQwnO13Qlzu7RI9NSkylai7BY1ixD7/vR7TimieopqUoXk3C1ucuMPeuLbc2KmUQ2TmKmih OMBXSnqpIfHr5x+pn9r2cIPHSmqip/MQFLTJSQ+5HbYWH3QomcULA/3ripORP3PX8559AXBB AD6p8CGsoqO7sYP4cujGbZnFpr8WDlGiB6i73gfM+/Grg5qhUVdswsgSBoJyfAO4CiluaYjM z39guRnFhiJztDBXZsre2QHOWqcaZFySLbf+hQuS9lMZ+//KsEQojwBMhlRBzSFJD7GfdSCs fmzPr0qeBckpYS2wwIw9Bq10KJwbUZH6+cv6X2f4FYDhylRhpQQdADhXQekiDBaOmzD/g+kR Uo/d3H0GUXDo9wXrdaKlw46DX55YS2L50Aeij2AY8rfs8tL3WLz59Rbj15aWR2GrfgUTmScx 1lAVTRUgtO4fxegx9Y/lA3gh5h3fU1f/s1rWLitSLoxUW9TVY0sVYJJOMyPd2rBDNzG/YA+H Ew83lwXWNO+u4LqkJRIQxR/WXmTiibSFBrpnlgpsoN9DaqQ/7gfn3mI6Uacu14Xfxu5Z0Dti mkeY0NKfWqCep9nVRpnw6xtOMH08eDGnyn5TzJ/Q7XZMs3oxB/N69bqD2B8oaaL51U1eLSE=
  • Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
  • Organization: nurpa

Hello tout le monde,

Je viens de tomber sur un article expliquant que la Cour constitutionnelle belge demande des clarification auprès de la Cour de justice de l'UE sur sa décision sur la rétention des données (Tele2 vs. Sweden AB and Watson).

Voici l'arrêt de la Cour constitutionnelle du 19 Juillet 2018: http://www.const-court.be/public/f/2018/2018-096f.pdf - est-ce qu'il y a quelqu'un ici qui a déjà vu et analysé ceci?

Les trois questions que la Cour demande à la CJEU:

1. First, it asks whether a general data retention obligation that is provided with storage and and access safegards, can be compatible with EU law, when it is not only aimed at fighting serious crime, but also intended to safeguard national security, defence, public security, and to prevent, investigate, detect and prosecute other criminal offences.

2. Second, the Court asks the same question as regards data retention legislation that would enable the state to fulfill its positive obligations to identify perpatrators of sexual child abuse, when they made use of electronic communication means, in order to effectively investigate and prosecute these crimes.

3. If the Court of Justice should come to the conclusion that the Belgian legislation violates EU Law, the Constitutional Court finally asks whether the consequences of the 2016 law can be maintained, in order to enable the further use of previously stored data, so that legal incertainty can be avoided

Deux petites citations en or de l'audience:

"The Belgian government suggests that the CJEU has not fully gripped the key feature of data retention laws as an addition to the already existing measures of focused, targeted gathering of data in the present or future."

et

"In the procedure before the Constitutional Court, the Belgian government insisted that you cannot know in advance which data you will need."

Merci,

Kirsten





Archives gérées par MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Haut de le page